[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yjhf4dlthDkHBICr@myrica>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:22:09 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu
Hi Baolu,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:20PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 627a3ed5ee8f..8e262210b5ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2812,6 +2812,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_dev_enable_feature(struct device *dev,
> master->iopf_enabled = true;
> return 0;
> case IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA:
> + dev->iommu->pasid_bits = master->ssid_bits;
This would be better in arm_smmu_probe_device()
Thanks,
Jean
> return arm_smmu_master_enable_sva(master);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists