[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220321114745.GI11336@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:47:45 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/11] iommu: Add iommu_domain type for SVA
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:21PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Add a new iommu domain type IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA to represent an I/O page
> table which is shared from CPU host VA. Add a sva_cookie field in the
> iommu_domain structure to save the mm_struct which represent the CPU
> memory page table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> include/linux/iommu.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 36f43af0af53..3e179b853380 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ struct iommu_domain_geometry {
> #define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PT (1U << 2) /* Domain is identity mapped */
> #define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ (1U << 3) /* DMA-API uses flush queue */
>
> +#define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_SHARED (1U << 4) /* Page table shared from CPU */
> +#define __IOMMU_DOMAIN_HOST_VA (1U << 5) /* Host CPU virtual address */
> +
> /*
> * This are the possible domain-types
> *
> @@ -86,6 +89,8 @@ struct iommu_domain_geometry {
> #define IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING | \
> __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_API | \
> __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ)
> +#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_SHARED | \
> + __IOMMU_DOMAIN_HOST_VA)
Is there any use for this in the core code? I feel like flags should
only be created if the core code needs to test them in some way.
> @@ -95,6 +100,7 @@ struct iommu_domain {
> void *handler_token;
> struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *iova_cookie;
> + struct mm_struct *sva_cookie;
Don't call a mm_struct a cookie please
And why do we need this in core code?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists