lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yjh8dX1iMsHUF4nU@alley>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:24:05 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     trix@...hat.com
Cc:     jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
        joe.lawrence@...hat.com, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer

On Sat 2022-03-19 18:51:43, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> Clang static analysis reports this issue
> livepatch-shadow-fix1.c:113:2: warning: Use of
>   memory after it is freed
>   pr_info("%s: dummy @ %p, prevented leak @ %p\n",
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The pointer is freed in the previous statement.
> Reorder the pr_info to report before the free.
> 
> Similar issue in livepatch-shadow-fix2.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>

Strictly speaking, the freed memory is not used.
pr_info() only prints the address.

Anyway, I agree that the reordered code is cleaner.

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ