[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjiBIx+QY2EtFBtO@xps13>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:44:03 -0400
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT] ufs: qcom: drop custom Android boot parameters
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The QCOM UFS driver requires an androidboot.bootdevice command line
> argument matching the UFS device name. If the name is different, it
> refuses to probe. Thise androidboot.bootdevice is provided by
> stock/vendor (from an Android-based device) bootloader.
>
> This does not make sense from Linux point of view. Driver should be
> able to boot regardless of bootloader. Driver should not depend on some
> Android custom environment data.
>
> Cc: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
I encountered that same code a few months ago and thought then that
this code doesn't belong here.
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists