[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GzC_LFd_1uTBDT=2otiUrJn9NGa4g=R4NhED7-p-G9RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:58 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, Randy.Wu@...iatek.com,
jieyy.yang@...iatek.com, chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com,
qizhong.cheng@...iatek.com, jian.yang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek: Add YAML schema for
PCIe PHY
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:56 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 18/03/22 14:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> > On 18/03/2022 12:12, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >> Il 18/03/22 10:54, Jianjun Wang ha scritto:
> >>> Add YAML schema documentation for PCIe PHY on MediaTek chipsets.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..868bf976568b
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>> +---
> >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,pcie-phy.yaml#
> >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>> +
> >>> +title: MediaTek PCIe PHY
> >>> +
> >>> +maintainers:
> >>> + - Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>
> >>> +
> >>> +description: |
> >>> + The PCIe PHY supports physical layer functionality for PCIe Gen3 port.
> >>> +
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + const: mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy
> >>
> >> Since I don't expect this driver to be only for MT8195, but to be extended to
> >> support some more future MediaTek SoCs and, depending on the number of differences
> >> in the possible future Gen4 PHYs, even different gen's, I propose to add a generic
> >> compatible as const.
> >>
> >> So you'll have something like:
> >>
> >> - enum:
> >> - mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy
> >> - const: mediatek,pcie-gen3-phy
> >
> > I am not sure if this is a good idea. How sure are you that there will
> > be no different PCIe Gen3 PHY not compatible with this one?
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing that out, I have underestimated this option.
>
> Perhaps Jianjun may be more informed about whether my proposal is valid or not.
Just FYI, for Allwinner and I believe Rockchip as well, the compatible strings
always list the first SoC the hardware block was seen on known at the time
of driver/binding submission. No generic compatible strings are ever used.
Not sure if that's the general rule or not.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists