[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164787121130.8124.16949440007845247535.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:00:11 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix kprobe_multi return probe backtrace
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:01:11 +0100 you wrote:
> hi,
> Andrii reported that backtraces from kprobe_multi program attached
> as return probes are not complete and showing just initial entry [1].
>
> Sending the fix together with bpf_get_func_ip inline revert, which is
> no longer suitable.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/2] Revert "bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86"
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f705ec764b34
- [bpf-next,2/2] bpf: Fix kprobe_multi return probe backtrace
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f70986902c86
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists