lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220321133220.833086671@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:52:45 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>,
        Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 09/32] esp6: fix check on ipv6_skip_exthdrs return value

From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>

[ Upstream commit 4db4075f92af2b28f415fc979ab626e6b37d67b6 ]

Commit 5f9c55c8066b ("ipv6: check return value of ipv6_skip_exthdr")
introduced an incorrect check, which leads to all ESP packets over
either TCPv6 or UDPv6 encapsulation being dropped. In this particular
case, offset is negative, since skb->data points to the ESP header in
the following chain of headers, while skb->network_header points to
the IPv6 header:

    IPv6 | ext | ... | ext | UDP | ESP | ...

That doesn't seem to be a problem, especially considering that if we
reach esp6_input_done2, we're guaranteed to have a full set of headers
available (otherwise the packet would have been dropped earlier in the
stack). However, it means that the return value will (intentionally)
be negative. We can make the test more specific, as the expected
return value of ipv6_skip_exthdr will be the (negated) size of either
a UDP header, or a TCP header with possible options.

In the future, we should probably either make ipv6_skip_exthdr
explicitly accept negative offsets (and adjust its return value for
error cases), or make ipv6_skip_exthdr only take non-negative
offsets (and audit all callers).

Fixes: 5f9c55c8066b ("ipv6: check return value of ipv6_skip_exthdr")
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv6/esp6.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6.c b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
index b7b573085bd5..5023f59a5b96 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/esp6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
@@ -813,8 +813,7 @@ int esp6_input_done2(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 		struct tcphdr *th;
 
 		offset = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, offset, &nexthdr, &frag_off);
-
-		if (offset < 0) {
+		if (offset == -1) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
 		}
-- 
2.34.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ