lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:10:00 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] usb: host: add xhci-exynos driver

On 21/03/2022 09:59, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> This driver supports USB Audio offload with Co-processor.

One do you need one more XHCI driver? How does it differ from existing
and why existing cannot be extended?

> It only cares DCBAA, Device Context, Transfer Ring, Event Ring, and ERST.
> They are allocated on specific address with xhci hooks.
> Co-processor could use them directly without xhci driver after then.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/Kconfig       |   9 +
>  drivers/usb/host/Makefile      |   1 +
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.c | 982 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.h |  63 +++
>  4 files changed, 1055 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.h
> 

Please address all the questions I raised in your v1, do not ignore them.

Please use get_maintainers.pl to CC all necessary people and lists. It
makes me very sad that you do not follow the kernel development process
(as mentioned in submitting-patches.rst and other documents).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ