linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] tools/nolibc: Remove .global

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:30:53 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] tools/nolibc: Remove .global _start from the
 entry point code

(Moving folks to bcc; check the lists if you're interested)

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:25 AM Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Then again, I'm not familiar with nolibc.
>
> No problem. The purpose is clearly *not* to implement a libc, but to have
> something very lightweight that allows to compile trivial programs. A good
> example of this is tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh. I'm
> personally using a tiny pre-init shell that I always package with my
> kernels and that builds with them [1]. It will never do big things but
> the balance between ease of use and coding effort is pretty good in my
> experience. And I'm also careful not to make it complicated to use nor
> to maintain, pragmatism is important and the effort should remain on the
> program developer if some arbitration is needed.

Neat, I bet that helps generate very small initrd! Got any quick size
measurements?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers