linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220322174050.241850-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:40:46 +0200
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization

This was tested with kvm-unit-test that was developed
for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c    |  7 +++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h    |  1 +
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 98647f5dec93..c1baa3a68ce6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -588,8 +588,17 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12
 		vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb02, VMCB_DR);
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(vmcb01->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))
+	if (unlikely(svm->lbrv_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+		/* Copy LBR related registers from vmcb12,
+		 * but make sure that we only pick LBR enable bit from the guest.
+		 */
+		svm_copy_lbrs(vmcb02, vmcb12);
+		vmcb02->save.dbgctl &= LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+		svm_update_lbrv(&svm->vcpu);
+
+	} else if (unlikely(vmcb01->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
 		svm_copy_lbrs(vmcb02, vmcb01);
+	}
 }
 
 static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -651,6 +660,9 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	vmcb02->control.virt_ext            = vmcb01->control.virt_ext &
 					      LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+	if (svm->lbrv_enabled)
+		vmcb02->control.virt_ext  |=
+			(svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
 
 	if (!nested_vmcb_needs_vls_intercept(svm))
 		vmcb02->control.virt_ext |= VIRTUAL_VMLOAD_VMSAVE_ENABLE_MASK;
@@ -919,7 +931,10 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01);
 
-	if (unlikely(vmcb01->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
+	if (unlikely(svm->lbrv_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+		svm_copy_lbrs(vmcb12, vmcb02);
+		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
+	} else if (unlikely(vmcb01->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
 		svm_copy_lbrs(vmcb01, vmcb02);
 		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index b3ba3bf2d95e..ec9a1dabdcc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -878,6 +878,10 @@ void svm_update_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	bool current_enable_lbrv = !!(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext &
 				      LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
 
+	if (unlikely(is_guest_mode(vcpu) && svm->lbrv_enabled))
+		if (unlikely(svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))
+			enable_lbrv = true;
+
 	if (enable_lbrv == current_enable_lbrv)
 		return;
 
@@ -4012,6 +4016,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			     guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS);
 
 	svm->tsc_scaling_enabled = tsc_scaling && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_TSCRATEMSR);
+	svm->lbrv_enabled = lbrv && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV);
 
 	svm->v_vmload_vmsave_enabled = vls && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD);
 
@@ -4765,6 +4770,8 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
 
 		if (vls)
 			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD);
+		if (lbrv)
+			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_LBRV);
 
 		/* Nested VM can receive #VMEXIT instead of triggering #GP */
 		kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 75373cb24a39..aaf46b1fbf76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
 	bool nrips_enabled                : 1;
 	bool tsc_scaling_enabled          : 1;
 	bool v_vmload_vmsave_enabled      : 1;
+	bool lbrv_enabled                 : 1;
 
 	u32 ldr_reg;
 	u32 dfr_reg;
-- 
2.26.3