lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chL6r=4Ay6udSv-heyH3pAdH=Cp+2mXU2-+Z7yHt+aH7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:06:39 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] perf/core: Fix incosistency between
 cgroup sched_out and sched_in

Hello,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 8:28 AM Chengming Zhou
<zhouchengming@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022/3/22 11:16 下午, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> > Hi peter,
> >
> > On 2022/3/22 10:54 下午, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:38:21PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> >>> On 2022/3/22 8:59 下午, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:08:29PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> >>>>> There is a race problem that can trigger WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp)
> >>>>> in perf_cgroup_switch().
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CPU1                                      CPU2
> >>>>> (in context_switch)                       (attach running task)
> >>>>> perf_cgroup_sched_out(prev, next)
> >>>>>   cgrp1 == cgrp2 is True
> >>>>>                                   next->cgroups = cgrp3
> >>>>>                                   perf_cgroup_attach()
> >>>>> perf_cgroup_sched_in(prev, next)
> >>>>>   cgrp1 == cgrp3 is False
>
> I see, you must have been misled by my wrong drawing above ;-)
> I'm sorry, perf_cgroup_attach() on the right should be put at the bottom.
>
> CPU1                                            CPU2
> (in context_switch)                             (attach running task)
> perf_cgroup_sched_out(prev, next)
>         cgrp1 == cgrp2 is True
>                                                 next->cgroups = cgrp3
> perf_cgroup_sched_in(prev, next)
>         cgrp1 == cgrp3 is False
>                                                 __perf_cgroup_move()
>

Yep, this is a real race and I saw the warnings reported sometimes.
The perf_cgroup_attach() is called after the task's cgroup is changed.

Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ