linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YjpLiKRUIB4TGJm0@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 23:19:52 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.18

+ Sebastian.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:05:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:11 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2):
> >       locking/local_lock: Make the empty local_lock_*() function a macro.
> 
> Grr. I noticed this too late, but this one actually breaks the build with clang.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Because it's now a macro, it doesn't use the argument at all, and you get:
> 
>     mm/page_alloc.c:131:40: error: variable 'pagesets' is not needed
> and will not be emitted [-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
>     static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagesets, pagesets) = {
>                                            ^
> 
> and I'm not sure why this doesn't show up with gcc, but apparently gcc
> only warns about unused static functions, not unused static data.
> 
> Or maybe gcc considers it used just because somebody did a typeof on it.
> 
> I thought -tip had started checking with clang, but apparently not.

As a matter of fact, I do see this in my builds:

mm/page_alloc.c:131:40: warning: variable 'pagesets' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagesets, pagesets) = {
                                       ^
1 warning generated.

but I dismissed it as one of those not-in-tip-area warnings. Sorry about
that, I'll try to pay more attention in the future.

> I see that the -mm tree has a fix for this, but I'm rather unhappy
> that the -tip tree build checking has deteriorated so much, and clang
> builds will now have a pointless build error that will cause issues
> for bisect.

Ah, you say build error because you have CONFIG_WERROR=y.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette