[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjlCTOrCUHnVxIqj@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:28:12 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yinan Zhang <zhangyinan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
william.kucharski@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, yejiajian2018@...il.szu.edu.cn,
hanshenghong2019@...il.szu.edu.cn, caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn,
zhaochongxi2019@...il.szu.edu.cn, yuhongf@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_owner.c: introduce vmalloc allocator for
page_owner
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:22:24AM +0800, Yinan Zhang wrote:
> An application's memory consumption is high and keeps increasing,
> then it is suspected of having memory leak. There are several
> commonly used memory allocators: slab, cma, vmalloc, etc. The memory
> leak identification can be speed up if page information allocated
> by an individual allocator are analyzed individually. This patch
> introduce vmalloc allocator for page_owner.
Why is /proc/vmallocinfo not enough?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists