linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yjl95OMvdCKGvwfT@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:42:28 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        linux-toolchains <linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 03:12:05PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> 
> That makes little sense. It's not an unusual merge conflict.

It is not only that; it is adding code that with an x86 arch maintainer
hat on I've never seen and don't agree with. Same for arm64 apparently.