[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjmQq1DvWnJwUh6R@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:02:35 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Rename "pci_dev->untrusted" to
"pci_dev->poses_dma_risk"
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:29:05PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Rename the field to make it more clear, that the device can execute DMA
> attacks on the system, and thus the system may need protection from
> such attacks from this device.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
> ---
> v4: Initial version, created based on comments on other patch
What a horrible name. Why not untrusted_dma which captures the
intent much better?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists