[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220322115148.3870-1-dharamhans87@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:21:46 +0530
From: Dharmendra Singh <dharamhans87@...il.com>
To: miklos@...redi.hu
Cc: Dharmendra Singh <dharamhans87@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] FUSE: Implement atomic lookup + open
In FUSE, as of now, uncached lookups are expensive over the wire.
E.g additional latencies and stressing (meta data) servers from
thousands of clients. These lookup calls possibly can be avoided
in some cases. Incoming two patches addresses this issue.
First patch handles the case where we open first time a file/dir or create
a file (O_CREAT) but do a lookup first on it. After lookup is performed
we make another call into libfuse to open the file. Now these two separate
calls into libfuse can be combined and performed as a single call into
libfuse.
Second patch handles the case when we are opening an already existing file
(positive dentry). Before this open call, we re-validate the inode and
this re-validation does a lookup on the file and verify the inode.
This separate lookup also can be avoided (for non-dir) and combined
with open call into libfuse.
Here is the link to the libfuse pull request which implements atomic open
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/644
I am going to post performance results shortly.
Dharmendra Singh (2):
FUSE: Implement atomic lookup + open
FUSE: Avoid lookup in d_revalidate()
fs/fuse/dir.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
fs/fuse/file.c | 30 ++++++-
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 13 ++-
fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 +-
fs/fuse/ioctl.c | 2 +-
include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists