linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fill in STU support for all supported chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:10 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, kabel@...nel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        olteanv@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fill in STU support for all
 supported chips

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:03:45 +0100 you wrote:
> Some chips using the split VTU/STU design will not accept VTU entries
> who's SID points to an invalid STU entry. Therefore, mark all those
> chips with either the mv88e6352_g1_stu_* or mv88e6390_g1_stu_* ops as
> appropriate.
> 
> Notably, chips for the Opal Plus (6085/6097) era seem to use a
> different implementation than those from Agate (6352) and onwards,
> even though their external interface is the same. The former happily
> accepts VTU entries referencing invalid STU entries, while the latter
> does not.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fill in STU support for all supported chips
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c050f5e91b47

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html