linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Add dynamic memory allocator support for nolibc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b998a2a3-a4e6-cf4f-9de7-0224f73ae88b@gnuweeb.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:43:43 +0700
From:   Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>,
        Nugraha <richiisei@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Add dynamic memory allocator support for
 nolibc

On 3/22/22 6:27 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ammar,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:21:07PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the v2 of RFC to add dynamic memory allocator support for
>> nolibc.
> So overall, except for the syscall6 implementation whereI agree with
> David that it would be better to always use the "push" variant, I'm
> fine with the rest of the series.

Will send a non-RFC patchset for this...

-- 
Ammar Faizi