[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjnIpn/PCM6wKpOC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:01:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf/core: Introduce percpu perf_cgroup
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:08:30PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Although we don't have incosistency problem any more, we can
> have other problem like:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> (in context_switch) (attach running task)
> prev->cgroups = cgrp2
> perf_cgroup_sched_switch(prev, next)
> cgrp2 == cgrp2 is True
>
Again, I'm not following, how can you attach to a running task from
another CPU ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists