[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cebb404f-b40c-35f9-0395-32cb28a34ab6@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:27:52 +0000
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
namhyung@...nel.org, leo.yan@...aro.org, Alexandre.Truong@....com,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] perf test arm64: Test unwinding using fame-pointer
(fp) mode
On 21/03/2022 20:52, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 05:48:50PM +0000, German Gomez escreveu:
>> On 16/03/2022 17:30, James Clark wrote:
>>> On 16/03/2022 17:20, German Gomez wrote:
>>>> Add a shell script to check that the call-graphs generated using frame
>>>> pointers (--call-graph fp) are complete and not missing leaf functions:
>>>>
>>>> | $ perf test 88 -v
>>>> | 88: Check Arm64 callgraphs are complete in fp mode :
>>>> | --- start ---
>>>> | test child forked, pid 8734
>>>> | + Compiling test program (/tmp/test_program.Cz3yL)...
>>>> | + Recording (PID=8749)...
>>>> | + Stopping perf-record...
>>>> | test_program.Cz
>>>> | 728 leaf
>>>> | 753 parent
>>>> | 76c main
>>>> | test child finished with 0
>>>> | ---- end ----
>>>> | Check Arm SPE callgraphs are complete in fp mode: Ok
>>>>
>>> Ran it on N1SDP and it passes, and it fails if b9f6fbb3b2c2 isn't applied.
>> I forgot to mention in the notes that it's supposed to work with both unwinders:
>>
>> $ make # for libunwind (default)
>> $ make NO_LIBUNWIND=1 # for libdw
> I'll add it to the cset commit log, and also will fix this:
>
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf]$ git am ./v2_20220316_german_gomez_perf_test_arm64_test_unwinding_using_fame_pointer_fp_mode.mbx
> Applying: perf test arm64: Test unwinding using fame-pointer (fp) mode
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:72: trailing whitespace.
> # program
> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_callgraph_fp.sh:58: trailing whitespace.
> +# program
> ⬢[acme@...lbox perf]$
>
Thanks Arnaldo, I forgot to run the checkpatch script.
>>> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>>>
>>>> Fixes: b9f6fbb3b2c2 ("perf arm64: Inject missing frames when using 'perf record --call-graph=fp'")
>>>> Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists