linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] support USB offload feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:31:30 +0900
From:   Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] support USB offload feature

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:05:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 11:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > [v3, 0/4] add xhci-exynos driver
> > >
> > > This patchset is for support xhci-exynos driver....
> > > ....
> > >
> > >   usb: host: export symbols for xhci-exynos to use xhci hooks
> > >   usb: host: add xhci hooks for xhci-exynos
> > >   usb: host: add some to xhci overrides for xhci-exynos
> > >   usb: host: add xhci-exynos driver
> >
> > Yes, that makes much more sense.  What would you want to see if you had
> > to review such a series?
> 
> Unfortunately it might not make more sense, because last time
> xhci-exynos driver was a fake driver, not for submission. It did not
> compile, it did not work in mainline.
> 
xhci-exynos driver wasn't compiled on v1,v2 but can be compiled on v3 series.

> That driver was not even sent to proper mailing lists, as pointed out
> by get_maintainers.pl, maybe because it was not developed on the
> mainline kernel, so there is no MAINTAINERS file?

There's no MAINTAINERS file yet as you guess.

Best Regards,
Jung Daehwan

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>