[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85e864fd-762e-0780-f829-bfbb178ab24e@ghiti.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:36:37 +0100
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [V3] PCI: fu740: Drop to 2.5GT/s to fix initial device probing on
some boards
On 3/21/22 14:49, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 3/18/22 16:24, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> The fu740 PCIe core does not probe any devices on the SiFive Unmatched
>> board without this fix (or having U-Boot explicitly start the PCIe via
>> either boot-script or user command). The fix is to start the link at
>> 2.5GT/s speeds and once the link is up then change the maximum speed
>> back
>> to the default.
>>
>> The U-Boot driver claims to set the link-speed to 2.5GT/s to get the
>> probe
>> to work (and U-Boot does print link up at 2.5GT/s) in the following
>> code:
>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_sifive.c?id=v2022.01#L271
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>> --
>> Note, this patch has had significant re-work since the previous 4
>> sets, including trying to fix style, message, reliance on the U-Boot
>> fix and the comments about usage of LINK_CAP and reserved fields.
>>
>> v2:
>> - fix issues with Gen1/2.5GTs
>> - updated comment on the initial probe
>> - run tests with both uninitialised and initialsed pcie from uboot
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
>> index 842b7202b96e..ecac0364178a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
>> @@ -181,10 +181,60 @@ static int fu740_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie
>> *pci)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>> struct fu740_pcie *afp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + u8 cap_exp = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>> + int ret;
>> + u32 orig, tmp;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Force 2.5GT/s when starting the link, due to some devices not
>> + * probing at higher speeds. This happens with the PCIe switch
>> + * on the Unmatched board when U-Boot has not initialised the PCIe.
>> + * The fix in U-Boot is to force 2.5GT/s, which then gets cleared
>> + * by the soft reset does by this driver.
>> + */
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "cap_exp at %x\n", cap_exp);
>> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
>> +
>> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>> + orig = tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
>> + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
>> + tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
>> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
>> /* Enable LTSSM */
>> writel_relaxed(0x1, afp->mgmt_base + PCIEX8MGMT_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE);
>> - return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>> + if ((tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS) != orig) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "changing speed back to original\n");
>> +
>> + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
>> + tmp |= orig;
>> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
>> +
>> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>> + tmp |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, tmp);
>> +
>> + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start at new speed\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = 0;
>> +err:
>> + WARN_ON(ret); /* we assume that errors will be very rare */
>> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> static int fu740_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>
> +cc Maciej and David as there is this other fix that seems to do the
> same but differently, it's been under review for some time now:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220302000043.GA662523@bhelgaas/t/
>
> I fell onto this issue recently, I'll give your patch and the above a
> try soon.
FWIW, I have tested this and it solved my issue with nvme not being
probed, so:
Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com>
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Thanks
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists