[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3cbe494-dae8-3fc7-60dd-c47ed914d904@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:57:06 +0800
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, maz@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eauger@...hat.com,
shan.gavin@...il.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Support SDEI Virtualization
Hi Oliver,
On 3/23/22 2:13 AM, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:06:48PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> This series intends to virtualize Software Delegated Exception Interface
>> (SDEI), which is defined by DEN0054C (v1.1). It allows the hypervisor to
>> deliver NMI-alike SDEI event to guest and it's needed by Async PF to
>> deliver page-not-present notification from hypervisor to guest. The code
>> and the required qemu changes can be found from:
>>
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0054/c
>> https://github.com/gwshan/linux ("kvm/arm64_sdei")
>> https://github.com/gwshan/qemu ("kvm/arm64_sdei")
>>
>> For the design and migration needs, please refer to the document in
>> PATCH[21/22] in this series. The series is organized as below:
>>
>> PATCH[01] Introduces template for smccc_get_argx()
>> PATCH[02] Adds SDEI virtualization infrastructure
>> PATCH[03-17] Supports various SDEI hypercalls and event handling
>> PATCH[18-20] Adds ioctl commands to support migration and configuration
>> and exports SDEI capability
>> PATCH[21] Adds SDEI document
>> PATCH[22] Adds SDEI selftest case
>>
>> Testing
>> =======
>>
>> [1] The selftest case included in this series works fine. The default SDEI
>> event, whose number is zero, can be registered, enabled, raised. The
>> SDEI event handler can be invoked.
>>
>> [host]# pwd
>> /home/gavin/sandbox/linux.main/tools/testing/selftests/kvm
>> [root@...tlab-arm01 kvm]# ./aarch64/sdei
>>
>> NR_VCPUS: 2 SDEI Event: 0x00000000
>>
>> --- VERSION
>> Version: 1.1 (vendor: 0x4b564d)
>> --- FEATURES
>> Shared event slots: 0
>> Private event slots: 0
>> Relative mode: No
>> --- PRIVATE_RESET
>> --- SHARED_RESET
>> --- PE_UNMASK
>> --- EVENT_GET_INFO
>> Type: Private
>> Priority: Normal
>> Signaled: Yes
>> --- EVENT_REGISTER
>> --- EVENT_ENABLE
>> --- EVENT_SIGNAL
>> Handled: Yes
>> IRQ: No
>> Status: Registered-Enabled-Running
>> PC/PSTATE: 000000000040232c 00000000600003c5
>> Regs: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> --- PE_MASK
>> --- EVENT_DISABLE
>> --- EVENT_UNREGISTER
>>
>> Result: OK
>>
>> [2] There are additional patches in the following repositories to create
>> procfs entries, allowing to inject SDEI event from host side. The
>> SDEI client in the guest side registers the SDEI default event, whose
>> number is zero. Also, the QEMU exports SDEI ACPI table and supports
>> migration for SDEI.
>>
>> https://github.com/gwshan/linux ("kvm/arm64_sdei")
>> https://github.com/gwshan/qemu ("kvm/arm64_sdei")
>>
>> [2.1] Start the guests and migrate the source VM to the destination
>> VM.
>>
>> [host]# /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
>> -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host \
>> -cpu host -smp 6,sockets=2,cores=3,threads=1 \
>> -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G \
>> : \
>> -kernel /home/gavin/sandbox/linux.guest/arch/arm64/boot/Image \
>> -initrd /home/gavin/sandbox/images/rootfs.cpio.xz \
>> -append earlycon=pl011,mmio,0x9000000 \
>> :
>>
>> [host]# /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
>> -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host \
>> -cpu host -smp 6,sockets=2,cores=3,threads=1 \
>> -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G \
>> : \
>> -kernel /home/gavin/sandbox/linux.guest/arch/arm64/boot/Image \
>> -initrd /home/gavin/sandbox/images/rootfs.cpio.xz \
>> -append earlycon=pl011,mmio,0x9000000 \
>> -incoming tcp:0:4444 \
>> :
>>
>> [2.2] Check kernel log on the source VM. The SDEI service is enabled
>> and the default SDEI event (0x0) is enabled.
>>
>> [guest-src]# dmesg | grep -i sdei
>> ACPI: SDEI 0x000000005BC80000 000024 \
>> (v00 BOCHS BXPC 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
>> sdei: SDEIv1.1 (0x4b564d) detected in firmware.
>> SDEI TEST: Version 1.1, Vendor 0x4b564d
>> sdei_init: SDEI event (0x0) registered
>> sdei_init: SDEI event (0x0) enabled
>>
>>
>> (qemu) migrate -d tcp:localhost:4444
>>
>> [2.3] Migrate the source VM to the destination VM. Inject SDEI event
>> to the destination VM. The event is raised and handled.
>>
>> (qemu) migrate -d tcp:localhost:4444
>>
>> [host]# echo 0 > /proc/kvm/kvm-5360/vcpu-1
>>
>> [guest-dst]#
>> =========== SDEI Event (CPU#1) ===========
>> Event: 0000000000000000 Parameter: 00000000dabfdabf
>> PC: ffff800008cbb554 PSTATE: 00000000604000c5 SP: ffff800009c7bde0
>> Regs: 00000000000016ee ffff00001ffd2e28 00000000000016ed 0000000000000001
>> ffff800016c28000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff800009399008
>> ffff8000097d9af0 ffff8000097d99f8 ffff8000093a8db8 ffff8000097d9b18
>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff000000339d00 0000000000000000
>> 0000000000000000 ffff800009c7bde0 ffff800008cbb5c4
>> Context: 00000000000016ee ffff00001ffd2e28 00000000000016ed 0000000000000001
>> ffff800016c28000 03ffffffffffffff 000000024325db59 ffff8000097de190
>> ffff00000033a790 ffff800008cbb814 0000000000000a30 0000000000000000
>>
>> Changelog
>> =========
>> v5:
>
> Next time can you include a link to the cover letter of the previous
> patch set? It is extremely helpful for understanding the progress to
> date and allows reviewers to see prior feedback.
>
Yep, I will provide the link to the cover letter of the previous version.
I'm amending it this time:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210815001352.81927-3-gshan@redhat.com/
Besides, I don't know what happened to my "git send-email". Some of the
recipients are skipped even I have put them into the cc list. Lets amend
it again to avoid resending the series.
Thanks,
Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists