linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2 0/3] vsock/virtio: enable VQs early on probe and finish the setup before using them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:43:13 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/3] vsock/virtio: enable VQs early on probe and
 finish the setup before using them

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:22:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:49:51AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> The first patch fixes a virtio-spec violation. The other two patches
>> complete the driver configuration before using the VQs in the probe.
>>
>> The patch order should simplify backporting in stable branches.
>
>Ok but I think the order is wrong. It should be 2-3-1,
>otherwise bisect can pick just 1 and it will have
>the issues previous reviw pointed out.

Right, I prioritized simplifying the backport, but obviously 
bisectability is priority!

I'll send v3 changing the order in 2-3-1

Thanks,
Stefano