[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220323134313.rmx24o3534rmgp3u@sgarzare-redhat>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:43:13 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/3] vsock/virtio: enable VQs early on probe and
finish the setup before using them
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:22:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:49:51AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> The first patch fixes a virtio-spec violation. The other two patches
>> complete the driver configuration before using the VQs in the probe.
>>
>> The patch order should simplify backporting in stable branches.
>
>Ok but I think the order is wrong. It should be 2-3-1,
>otherwise bisect can pick just 1 and it will have
>the issues previous reviw pointed out.
Right, I prioritized simplifying the backport, but obviously
bisectability is priority!
I'll send v3 changing the order in 2-3-1
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists