[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35f58894-ed6d-0af0-e483-7a161ad6625a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:56:09 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: aford@...conembedded.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Change imx8mn and imx8mp
compatible fallback
On 23/03/2022 14:40, Adam Ford wrote:
> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> index 7dbbcae9485c..d6ea73d76bdd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
Your change looks reasonable, but why imx8mm is compatible with imx7d?
> - - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
> - - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
> - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
> - items:
> - enum:
> + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
> - fsl,imx93-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc
> - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists