linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:33:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sun Shouxin <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn>, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
        vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        pabeni@...hat.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, oliver@...kum.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        huyd12@...natelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:35:03 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/23/22 6:09 AM, Sun Shouxin wrote:
> > This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode.
>
> net-next is closed, so this set needs to be delayed until it re-opens.

What I'm not sure of is why this gets reposted after Jiri nacked
it. A conclusion needs to be reached on whether we want this
functionality in the first place. Or someone needs to explain 
to me what the conclusion is if I'm not reading the room right :)