[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220324091527.077e068f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 09:15:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the asm-generic
tree
Hi a;;,
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 17:24:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the folio tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/nds32/include/asm/pgtable.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 9f15ac318b83 ("nds32: Remove the architecture")
>
> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
>
> e558a885a525 ("arch: Add pmd_pfn() where it is missing")
>
> from the folio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just deleted the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the asm-generic tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists