[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220324070939.59297-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:09:39 +0100
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
To: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] char: xillybus: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
---
drivers/char/xillybus/xillybus_class.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/xillybus/xillybus_class.c b/drivers/char/xillybus/xillybus_class.c
index 5046486011c8..0f238648dcfe 100644
--- a/drivers/char/xillybus/xillybus_class.c
+++ b/drivers/char/xillybus/xillybus_class.c
@@ -174,18 +174,17 @@ void xillybus_cleanup_chrdev(void *private_data,
struct device *dev)
{
int minor;
- struct xilly_unit *unit;
- bool found = false;
+ struct xilly_unit *unit = NULL, *iter;
mutex_lock(&unit_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(unit, &unit_list, list_entry)
- if (unit->private_data == private_data) {
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &unit_list, list_entry)
+ if (iter->private_data == private_data) {
+ unit = iter;
break;
}
- if (!found) {
+ if (!unit) {
dev_err(dev, "Weird bug: Failed to find unit\n");
mutex_unlock(&unit_mutex);
return;
@@ -216,22 +215,21 @@ int xillybus_find_inode(struct inode *inode,
{
int minor = iminor(inode);
int major = imajor(inode);
- struct xilly_unit *unit;
- bool found = false;
+ struct xilly_unit *unit = NULL, *iter;
mutex_lock(&unit_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(unit, &unit_list, list_entry)
- if (unit->major == major &&
- minor >= unit->lowest_minor &&
- minor < (unit->lowest_minor + unit->num_nodes)) {
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &unit_list, list_entry)
+ if (iter->major == major &&
+ minor >= iter->lowest_minor &&
+ minor < (iter->lowest_minor + iter->num_nodes)) {
+ unit = iter;
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&unit_mutex);
- if (!found)
+ if (!unit)
return -ENODEV;
*private_data = unit->private_data;
base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists