[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220324073110.66125-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:31:10 +0100
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/spapr_tce: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
index 708a95e61831..f64ef767909a 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ static long tce_iommu_unregister_pages(struct tce_container *container,
__u64 vaddr, __u64 size)
{
struct mm_iommu_table_group_mem_t *mem;
- struct tce_iommu_prereg *tcemem;
- bool found = false;
+ struct tce_iommu_prereg *tcemem = NULL, *iter;
long ret;
if ((vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK) || (size & ~PAGE_MASK))
@@ -115,14 +114,14 @@ static long tce_iommu_unregister_pages(struct tce_container *container,
if (!mem)
return -ENOENT;
- list_for_each_entry(tcemem, &container->prereg_list, next) {
- if (tcemem->mem == mem) {
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &container->prereg_list, next) {
+ if (iter->mem == mem) {
+ tcemem = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (!found)
+ if (!tcemem)
ret = -ENOENT;
else
ret = tce_iommu_prereg_free(container, tcemem);
@@ -1330,19 +1329,19 @@ static void tce_iommu_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
{
struct tce_container *container = iommu_data;
struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
- bool found = false;
- struct tce_iommu_group *tcegrp;
+ struct tce_iommu_group *tcegrp = NULL;
+ struct tce_iommu_group *iter;
mutex_lock(&container->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(tcegrp, &container->group_list, next) {
- if (tcegrp->grp == iommu_group) {
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &container->group_list, next) {
+ if (iter->grp == iommu_group) {
+ tcegrp = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (!found) {
+ if (!tcegrp) {
pr_warn("tce_vfio: detaching unattached group #%u\n",
iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
goto unlock_exit;
base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists