[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a06fef85-7b5c-b2ef-7965-2387cbc8f724@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:53:59 +0800
From: Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
HÃ¥kon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/SA: replace usage of found with dedicated list
iterator variable
On 3/24/2022 3:11 PM, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/sa_query.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/sa_query.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/sa_query.c
> index 74ecd7456a11..74cd84045e5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/sa_query.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/sa_query.c
> @@ -1035,10 +1035,9 @@ int ib_nl_handle_resolve_resp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct ib_sa_query *query;
> + struct ib_sa_query *query = NULL, *iter;
> struct ib_mad_send_buf *send_buf;
> struct ib_mad_send_wc mad_send_wc;
> - int found = 0;
> int ret;
>
> if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REQUEST) ||
> @@ -1046,20 +1045,20 @@ int ib_nl_handle_resolve_resp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return -EPERM;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ib_nl_request_lock, flags);
> - list_for_each_entry(query, &ib_nl_request_list, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &ib_nl_request_list, list) {
> /*
> * If the query is cancelled, let the timeout routine
> * take care of it.
> */
> - if (nlh->nlmsg_seq == query->seq) {
> - found = !ib_sa_query_cancelled(query);
> - if (found)
> - list_del(&query->list);
> + if (nlh->nlmsg_seq == iter->seq) {
> + if (!ib_sa_query_cancelled(iter))
> + list_del(&iter->list);
> + query = iter;
> break;
Should it be:
if (nlh->nlmsg_seq == iter->seq) {
if (!ib_sa_query_cancelled(iter)) {
list_del(&iter->list);
query = iter;
}
break;
> }
> }
>
> - if (!found) {
> + if (!query) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ib_nl_request_lock, flags);
> goto resp_out;
> }
>
> base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists