[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1648107843-29077-1-git-send-email-unSimple1993@163.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:44:03 +0800
From: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
To: kristo@...nel.org
Cc: ssantosh@...nel.org, nm@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] soc: ti: ti_sci_pm_domains: Check for null return of devm_kcalloc
The allocation funciton devm_kcalloc may fail and return a null pointer,
which would cause a null-pointer dereference later.
It might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM just like the
usage of devm_kcalloc in previous code.
Signed-off-by: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
---
drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
index 8afb3f45..a33ec7e 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static int ti_sci_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
devm_kcalloc(dev, max_id + 1,
sizeof(*pd_provider->data.domains),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pd_provider->data.domains)
+ return -ENOMEM;
pd_provider->data.num_domains = max_id + 1;
pd_provider->data.xlate = ti_sci_pd_xlate;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists