linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: add support for fwnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66a8bb8aebf2a6683aca4303f6b6bf598ed7afd0.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:44:20 +0100
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: add support for fwnode

On Mi, 2022-03-23 at 17:21 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> Le Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:29:41 +0100,
> Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> a écrit :
> 
> > On Mi, 2022-03-23 at 10:50 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > index 61e688882643..f014da03b7c1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > >   *
> > >   * Copyright 2013 Philipp Zabel, Pengutronix
> > >   */
> > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > >  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > >  #include <linux/device.h>
> > >  #include <linux/err.h>
> > > @@ -70,26 +71,49 @@ static const char *rcdev_name(struct
> > > reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
> > >         if (rcdev->of_node)
> > >                 return rcdev->of_node->full_name;  
> > 
> > Could the above be removed, since reset_controller_register() set
> > rcdev->fwnode to of_fwnode_handle(rcdev->of_node) earlier?
> 
> Yes, this should work in all cases, the only difference is that
> fwnode_get_name() returns the basename of the of_node full_name
> field.
> This is potentially a change from what was displayed before. If you are
> ok with that, I'll drop these lines.

Yes, that should be fine. rcdev_name() is currently only used in
warnings that let driver developers know which reset controller they
used incorrectly.

regards
Philipp