lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W45wydNfUc1vAx228_yQrE6uzyucBhT6sc5_iqktva=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:23:40 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree for
 herobrine villager

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:12 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:59:51PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:13 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add a basic device tree for the herobrine villager board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
> > >  .../dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-villager-r0.dts | 274 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 275 insertions(+)
> >
> > Question: how does this interact with the patch:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220316172814.v1.3.Iad21bd53f3ac14956b8dbbf3825fc7ab29abdf97@changeid/
> >
> > Specifically, if that patch lands first don't you need to add a patch
> > to turn on "pp3300_codec" ?
>
> Right, I missed that. I'll add it in the next version, thanks!

Great! Make sure to list that other patch as a dependency somewhere
too to help Bjorn when he's able to apply. ;-)


> > I was also looking at whether we should be enabling the wf_cam
> > regulators for villager. I believe that answer is "no",
>
> I agree to keep them disabled.
>
> > but _also_ I believe that we should be _disabling_ the uf_cam
> > regulators for villager, right?
>
> it is not clear yo me which regulator you have in mind for the UF cam,
> could you clarify?

I was thinking of the ones next to the rainbows and unicorns in the
device tree. Oh wait, those were just in my imagination. Please
disregard.

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ