[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZJch7SmMNGhfJ9hpNP+=yy4ZE_8wuATsaqdHQdaMhbAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 23:30:19 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpiolib: Handle immutable irq_chip structures
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:35 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I'm happy with this approach as long as the 300+ drivers get fixed
> > and the old way of doing it gets deleted.
>
> Of course. Note that it will take some time before it actually happens.
> My current plan is to stick in a pr_warn() each time a driver
> following the old scheme gets registered, as a nudge for people to
> update their driver if they care about it.
Fair enough, we have a bunch of those WIP churn tasks in
GPIO anyways.
What about adding a blurb to:
drivers/gpio/TODO
so we have it on the radar?
> Regarding documentation, are you OK with me simply replacing the
> current code samples with the new approach? It will at least avoid
> giving people the wrong idea. I also want to write a brief migration
> guide that people willing to bump up their patch count can follow.
Yup
> I'll repost something once -rc1 is out.
Sounds good!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists