[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220325035318.42168-4-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:53:16 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] perf/core: Don't need event_filter_match in merge_sched_in()
There is one obselete comment in perf_cgroup_switch(), since
we don't use event_filter_match() when event_sched_out().
Then found we needn't to use event_filter_match() in
merge_sched_in() too. Because now we use the perf_event groups
RB-tree to get the exact matched perf_events, don't need to
go through the event_filter_match() to check if matched again.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index dd985c77bc37..225d408deb1a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -856,7 +856,8 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
/*
* must not be done before ctxswout due
- * to event_filter_match() in event_sched_out()
+ * to update_cgrp_time_from_cpuctx() in
+ * ctx_sched_out()
*/
cpuctx->cgrp = NULL;
}
@@ -3804,9 +3805,6 @@ static int merge_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
if (event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
return 0;
- if (!event_filter_match(event))
- return 0;
-
if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, *can_add_hw)) {
if (!group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx))
list_add_tail(&event->active_list, get_event_list(event));
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists