linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Simple runqueue order on migrate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <f59f1dfeec4692e7a373cc810168912a2d2f8f3c.1648228023.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:54:17 -0700
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Walter Mack <walter.mack@...el.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Simple runqueue order on migrate

From: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>

From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

There's a number of problems with SMP migration of fair tasks, but
basically it boils down to a task not receiving equal service on each
runqueue (consider the trivial 3 tasks 2 cpus infeasible weight
scenario).

Fully solving that with vruntime placement is 'hard', not least
because a task might be very under-services on a busy runqueue and
would need to be placed so far left on the new runqueue that it would
significantly impact latency on the existing tasks.

Instead do minimal / basic placement instead; when moving to a less
busy queue place at the front of the queue to receive time sooner.
When moving to a busier queue, place at the end of the queue to
receive time later.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Tested-by: Walter Mack <walter.mack@...el.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/features.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2498e97804fd..c5d2cb3a8f42 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4223,6 +4223,27 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
 	se->vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime);
 }
 
+static void place_entity_migrate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+	if (!sched_feat(PLACE_MIGRATE))
+		return;
+
+	if (cfs_rq->nr_running < se->migrated) {
+		/*
+		 * Migrated to a shorter runqueue, go first because
+		 * we were under-served on the old runqueue.
+		 */
+		se->vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Migrated to a longer runqueue, go last because
+	 * we got over-served on the old runqueue.
+	 */
+	se->vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime + sched_vslice(cfs_rq, se);
+}
+
 static void check_enqueue_throttle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
 
 static inline bool cfs_bandwidth_used(void);
@@ -4296,6 +4317,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 
 	if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
 		place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
+	else if (se->migrated)
+		place_entity_migrate(cfs_rq, se);
 
 	check_schedstat_required();
 	update_stats_enqueue_fair(cfs_rq, se, flags);
@@ -6930,6 +6953,7 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
  */
 static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 {
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 	/*
 	 * As blocked tasks retain absolute vruntime the migration needs to
 	 * deal with this by subtracting the old and adding the new
@@ -6962,7 +6986,7 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 		 * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
 		 */
 		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
-		detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
+		detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
 
 	} else {
 		/*
@@ -6973,14 +6997,15 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 		 * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
 		 * sounds not bad.
 		 */
-		remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
+		remove_entity_load_avg(se);
 	}
 
 	/* Tell new CPU we are migrated */
-	p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
+	se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
 
 	/* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
-	p->se.migrated = 1;
+	for_each_sched_entity(se)
+		se->migrated = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq_of(se)->nr_running) + !se->on_rq;
 
 	update_scan_period(p, new_cpu);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 1cf435bbcd9c..681c84fd062c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -100,3 +100,5 @@ SCHED_FEAT(LATENCY_WARN, false)
 
 SCHED_FEAT(ALT_PERIOD, true)
 SCHED_FEAT(BASE_SLICE, true)
+
+SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_MIGRATE, true)
-- 
2.32.0