[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANFS6banUM8ycVyjTz2rHQCbNFttX6HkDHo-2eEwAei9XEu1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:58:13 +0900
From: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksmbd: replace usage of found with dedicated list
iterator variable
Reviewed-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>
2022년 3월 24일 (목) 오후 4:13, Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>님이 작성:
>
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> index 67e8e28e3fc3..be9606b9a944 100644
> --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> @@ -6618,8 +6618,7 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> struct ksmbd_conn *conn = work->conn;
> struct smb2_hdr *hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->request_buf);
> struct smb2_hdr *chdr;
> - struct ksmbd_work *cancel_work = NULL;
> - int canceled = 0;
> + struct ksmbd_work *cancel_work = NULL, *iter;
> struct list_head *command_list;
>
> ksmbd_debug(SMB, "smb2 cancel called on mid %llu, async flags 0x%x\n",
> @@ -6629,11 +6628,11 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> command_list = &conn->async_requests;
>
> spin_lock(&conn->request_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(cancel_work, command_list,
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, command_list,
> async_request_entry) {
> - chdr = smb2_get_msg(cancel_work->request_buf);
> + chdr = smb2_get_msg(iter->request_buf);
>
> - if (cancel_work->async_id !=
> + if (iter->async_id !=
> le64_to_cpu(hdr->Id.AsyncId))
> continue;
>
> @@ -6641,7 +6640,7 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> "smb2 with AsyncId %llu cancelled command = 0x%x\n",
> le64_to_cpu(hdr->Id.AsyncId),
> le16_to_cpu(chdr->Command));
> - canceled = 1;
> + cancel_work = iter;
> break;
> }
> spin_unlock(&conn->request_lock);
> @@ -6649,24 +6648,24 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
> command_list = &conn->requests;
>
> spin_lock(&conn->request_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(cancel_work, command_list, request_entry) {
> - chdr = smb2_get_msg(cancel_work->request_buf);
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, command_list, request_entry) {
> + chdr = smb2_get_msg(iter->request_buf);
>
> if (chdr->MessageId != hdr->MessageId ||
> - cancel_work == work)
> + iter == work)
> continue;
>
> ksmbd_debug(SMB,
> "smb2 with mid %llu cancelled command = 0x%x\n",
> le64_to_cpu(hdr->MessageId),
> le16_to_cpu(chdr->Command));
> - canceled = 1;
> + cancel_work = iter;
> break;
> }
> spin_unlock(&conn->request_lock);
> }
>
> - if (canceled) {
> + if (cancel_work) {
> cancel_work->state = KSMBD_WORK_CANCELLED;
> if (cancel_work->cancel_fn)
> cancel_work->cancel_fn(cancel_work->cancel_argv);
>
> base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Thanks,
Hyunchul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists