[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yj1wZtQId8QVtBop@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:33:58 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
"sj1557.seo@...sung.com" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andy.Wu@...y.com" <Andy.Wu@...y.com>,
"Wataru.Aoyama@...y.com" <Wataru.Aoyama@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: reduce block requests when zeroing a cluster
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:22:54AM +0000, Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com wrote:
> Hi Christoph Hellwig,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 03:00:55AM +0000, Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com wrote:
> > > +#include <linux/blk_types.h>
> >
> > blk_types.h is not a header for public use. What do you want it for?
>
> + struct address_space *mapping = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
>
> The type of 'sb->s_bdev' is 'struct block_device'.
> I want to include the definition of 'struct block_device'('struct block_device' is defined in <linux/blk_types.h>).
Oh, I missed that. We really should not derefrence bd_inode in file
systems. So maybe we need to add a sync_blockdev_range abstraction if
we want to support this use case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists