linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: fix possible use-after-free bug in error handling code of btrfs_get_root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:04:17 +0800
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz
Cc:     clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: fix possible use-after-free bug in error
 handling code of btrfs_get_root_ref()



On 2022/3/25 2:19, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 06:44:54AM -0700, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> In btrfs_get_root_ref(), when btrfs_insert_fs_root() fails,
>> btrfs_put_root() will be called to possibly free the memory area of
>> the variable root. However, this variable is then used again in error
>> handling code after "goto fail", when ret is not -EEXIST.
>>
>> To fix this possible bug, btrfs_put_root() is only called when ret is
>> -EEXIST for "goto again".
>>
>> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index b30309f187cf..126f244cdf88 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -1850,9 +1850,10 @@ static struct btrfs_root *btrfs_get_root_ref(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>   
>>   	ret = btrfs_insert_fs_root(fs_info, root);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		btrfs_put_root(root);
>> -		if (ret == -EEXIST)
>> +		if (ret == -EEXIST) {
>> +			btrfs_put_root(root);
> I think this fix is correct, though it's not that clear. If you look how
> the code changed, there was the unconditional put and then followed by a
> free:
>
> 8c38938c7bb0 ("btrfs: move the root freeing stuff into btrfs_put_root")
>
> Here it's putting twice where one will be the final free.
>
> And then the whole refcounting gets updated in
>
> 4785e24fa5d2 ("btrfs: don't take an extra root ref at allocation time")
>
> which could be removing the wrong put, I'm not yet sure.

Thanks for the reply!

I think the bug should be introduced by this commit:
bc44d7c4b2b1 ("btrfs: push btrfs_grab_fs_root into btrfs_get_fs_root")

This commit has a change:
      ret = btrfs_insert_fs_root(fs_info, root);
      if (ret) {
+      btrfs_put_fs_root(root);
          if (ret == -EEXIST) {
              btrfs_free_fs_root(root);
              goto again;
          }

I could add a Fixes tag of this commit in my V2 patch.
Is it okay?


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai