[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <969a2030a492f3cecdb7d0095478f1b779c643c3.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:32:03 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: new ltp memcg gripe bisects to b67bf49ce7aa ("post mm/munlock:
delete FOLL_MLOCK and FOLL_POPULATE")
Greetings,
$subject bisected in a kvm ala:
leap153:/usr/local/ltp # cat testme
export PATH=$PATH:`pwd`/testcases/bin
memcg_stat_test.sh
leap153:/usr/local/ltp # . ./testme
Usually leads to...
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Test unevictable with MAP_LOCKED
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Running memcg_process --mmap-lock1 -s 135168
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Warming up pid: 3460
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Process is still here after warm up: 3460
memcg_stat_test 3 TFAIL: unevictable is 122880, 135168 expected
...but may lead to...
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Test unevictable with mlock
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Running memcg_process --mmap-lock2 -s 135168
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Warming up pid: 4271
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Process is still here after warm up: 4271
memcg_stat_test 4 TFAIL: unevictable is 122880, 135168 expected
...or both. A wee bit flaky.
I wanted to verify with a revert on top of 85c7000fda00, but while the
revert patch applied, the result didn't boot. Config is full distro.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists