[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yj2s8WZ4Pv1QuckE@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:52:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/config: Make the x86 defconfigs a bit more usable
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:47:27AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:31:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig
> > -# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>
> I don't think this is right, this is repeating the problem that was
> fixed by commit 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset
> CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig").
>
> $ make ARCH=i386 savedefconfig
>
> ?
+1 here, there are still branches in use that have i386 defconfig as
as base and making this problem again is not okay.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists