[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db3efe0f-b6ca-e183-8562-bcf5e6b02679@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:46:20 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>, gene_chen@...htek.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add binding for Richtek
RT5759 DCDC converter
On 25/03/2022 14:44, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
(...)
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + # example 1 for RT5759
>>> + - |
>>> + i2c {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + rt5759@62 {
>>
>> Generic node name, so pmic.
>>
> As my understanding, 'pmic' means there must be multiple channels of
> buck or ldo.
> But rt5759 is only one channel buck converter.
Then "regulator". rt5759 is not a generic name but specific.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists