[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220325022219.829-2-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:22:17 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de, rafael@...nel.org,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/fpu: Make XCR0 accessors immune to unwanted compiler reordering
Some old GCC versions (4.9.x and 5.x) have an issue that incorrectly
reordering volatile asm statements with each other [1]. While this bug was
fixed on later versions (8.1, 7.3, and 6.5), and the kernel's current XCR0
read/write do not appear to be impacted, it is preventive to ensure them on
the program order.
Have a memory clobber for write to prevent caching/reordering memory
accesses across other XCR0 writes. A dummy operand with an arbitrary
address can prevent the compiler from reordering with other writes. Add the
dummy operand for read as used for other accessors in aa5cacdc29d
("x86/asm: Replace __force_order with a memory clobber").
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82602
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
Changes from v2:
* Add as a new patch (Dave Hansen).
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xcr.h | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xcr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xcr.h
index 9656a5bc6fea..9b513e7c0161 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xcr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xcr.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_FPU_XCR_H
#define _ASM_X86_FPU_XCR_H
+#include <asm/special_insns.h>
+
#define XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK 0x00000000
#define XCR_XFEATURE_IN_USE_MASK 0x00000001
@@ -9,7 +11,8 @@ static inline u64 xgetbv(u32 index)
{
u32 eax, edx;
- asm volatile("xgetbv" : "=a" (eax), "=d" (edx) : "c" (index));
+ asm volatile("xgetbv" : "=a" (eax), "=d" (edx) : "c" (index),
+ __FORCE_ORDER);
return eax + ((u64)edx << 32);
}
@@ -18,7 +21,8 @@ static inline void xsetbv(u32 index, u64 value)
u32 eax = value;
u32 edx = value >> 32;
- asm volatile("xsetbv" :: "a" (eax), "d" (edx), "c" (index));
+ asm volatile("xsetbv" :: "a" (eax), "d" (edx), "c" (index)
+ : "memory");
}
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists