[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <632d3601-ecf4-12f3-4f3b-408c35f028f6@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:53:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES
On 3/25/22 16:31, Peter Gonda wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:29 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/25/22 16:27, Peter Gonda wrote:
>>> SEV-ES guests can request termination using the GHCB's MSR protocol. See
>>> AMD's GHCB spec section '4.1.13 Termination Request'. Currently when a
>>> guest does this the userspace VMM sees an KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN (-EVINAL)
>>> return code from KVM_RUN. By adding a KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN_ENTRY to kvm_run
>>> struct the userspace VMM can clear see the guest has requested a SEV-ES
>>> termination including the termination reason code set and reason code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>>> Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
>>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>>> Cc: Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> This is missing an update to Documentation/.
>>
>
> My mistake. I'll send another revision. Is the behavior of
> KVM_CAP_EXIT_SHUTDOWN_REASON OK? Or should we only return 1 for SEV-ES
> guests?
No, you can return 1 unconditionally, but you should also set reason and
clear ndata in the other cases that return KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists