linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma/pool: do not complain if DMA pool is not allocated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yj3zyLs4f+ba6UqF@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:54:32 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma/pool: do not complain if DMA pool is not allocated

On Fri 25-03-22 17:48:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Dang, I have just realized that I have misread the boot log and it has
> > turned out that a674e48c5443 is covering my situation because the
> > allocation failure message says:
> >
> > Node 0 DMA free:0kB boost:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB reserved_highatomic:0KB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:636kB managed:0kB mlocked:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB
> 
> As in your report is from a kernel that does not have a674e48c5443
> yet?

yes. I just mixed up the early boot messages and thought that DMA zone
ended up with a single page. That message was saying something else
though.
 
> > I thought there are only few pages in the managed by the DMA zone. This
> > is still theoretically possible so I think __GFP_NOWARN makes sense here
> > but it would require to change the patch description.
> > 
> > Is this really worth it?
> 
> In general I think for kernels where we need the pool and can't allocate
> it, a warning is very useful.  We just shouldn't spew it when there is
> no need for the pool to start with.

Well, do we have any way to find that out during early boot?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs