linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm*: use simple i2c probe function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220325182616.6fb6e13e@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:26:16 +0100
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm*: use simple i2c probe function

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:14:40 +0000, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 05:24:39PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> > ("probe_new") can be used instead.  
> 
> This is going to generate conflicts with other pending and more
> substantial patches for wm8731 - please resubmit after those have been
> applied, or split up into finer grained patches so the rest can go.

Ah right, I’ll re-submit without wm8731.

Which tree should I check for conflicts? I’ve got similar patches across all
the i2c-using sound/soc/codecs files, I wouldn’t want to waste anyone’s time
if I can check beforehand...

Regards,

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped