linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.309-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yj650YKy7UG+enlA@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2022 07:59:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.309-rc1 review

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 
> PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part
> of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y?

Because they were not submitted for inclusion :(