lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f6372a2f880c6e8597a8f070eb031d4cd451d37e.1648291287.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:41:46 +0100
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib/bitmap.c make bitmap_print_bitmask_to_buf parseable

The documentation of such function is not on a proper ReST format,
as reported by Sphinx:

    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:526: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:532: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:533: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:542: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:536: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:543: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:545: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:545: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:552: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:554: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:556: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
    Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:81: ./lib/bitmap.c:580: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.

So, the produced output at:

	https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/kernel-api.html?#c.bitmap_print_bitmask_to_buf

is broken. Fix it by adding spaces and marking the literal blocks.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
---
 lib/bitmap.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index 0d5c2ece0bcb..8ebe508580ea 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -527,33 +527,39 @@ static int bitmap_print_to_buf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
  * cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() or directly by drivers to export hexadecimal
  * bitmask and decimal list to userspace by sysfs ABI.
  * Drivers might be using a normal attribute for this kind of ABIs. A
- * normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
- * static ssize_t example_attribute_show(struct device *dev,
+ * normal attribute typically has show entry as below::
+ *
+ *   static ssize_t example_attribute_show(struct device *dev,
  * 		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
- * {
+ *   {
  * 	...
  * 	return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &mask, nr_trig_max);
- * }
+ *   }
+ *
  * show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
  * means the file is limited to one page only.
  * bitmap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
- * normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
- * bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
+ * normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count::
+ *
+ *   bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
  * 			   int nmaskbits)
- * {
- * }
+ *   {
+ *   }
+ *
  * The problem is once we have a large bitmap, we have a chance to get a
  * bitmask or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be
  * as complex as 0,3,5,7,9,... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
  * It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
- * has show entry as below:
- * static ssize_t
- * example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
+ * has show entry as below::
+ *
+ *   static ssize_t
+ *   example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
  * 		struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
  * 		loff_t offset, size_t count)
- * {
+ *   {
  * 	...
- * }
+ *   }
+ *
  * With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
  * to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
  * >= 4096.
@@ -577,6 +583,7 @@ static int bitmap_print_to_buf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
  * This function is not a replacement for sprintf() or bitmap_print_to_pagebuf().
  * It is intended to workaround sysfs limitations discussed above and should be
  * used carefully in general case for the following reasons:
+ *
  *  - Time complexity is O(nbits^2/count), comparing to O(nbits) for snprintf().
  *  - Memory complexity is O(nbits), comparing to O(1) for snprintf().
  *  - @off and @count are NOT offset and number of bits to print.
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ