[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yj8F6sQzx6Bvy+aZ@codewreck.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 21:24:10 +0900
From: asmadeus@...ewreck.org
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Cc: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
ericvh@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lucho@...kov.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
syzbot+5e28cdb7ebd0f2389ca4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 12:48:26PM +0100:
> [...]
>
> > Signed-off-by: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@...il.com>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+5e28cdb7ebd0f2389ca4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Looks good to me - it's pretty much what I'd have done if I hadn't
forgotten!
It doesn't strike me as anything critical and I don't have anything else
for this cycle so I'll just queue it in -next for now, and submit it
at the start of the 5.19 cycle in ~2months.
> I'm not absolutely sure that this will really fix this issue, but it seems to
> be a good idea to add a rcu_barrier() call here nevertheless.
Yeah, I'm not really sure either but this is the only idea I have given
the debug code doesn't list anything left in the cache, and David came
to the same conclusion :/
Can't hurt though, so let's try and see if syzbot complains
again. Thanks for the review!
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists