[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220326100956.2d8acf1df409a890403eefcc@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:09:56 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] kprobes: rethook: x86: Replace
kretprobe trampoline with rethook
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:43:14 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:22:53PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > Masami Hiramatsu (3):
> > kprobes: Use rethook for kretprobe if possible
> > rethook: kprobes: x86: Replace kretprobe with rethook on x86
> > x86,kprobes: Fix optprobe trampoline to generate complete pt_regs
> >
> > Peter Zijlstra (1):
> > Subject: x86,rethook: Fix arch_rethook_trampoline() to generate a complete pt_regs
>
> You fat-fingered the subject there ^
>
Oops, I missed to import the patch...
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks!
>
> Hopefully the ftrace return trampoline can also be switched over..
The rethook clarifies the interfaces for the return trampoline, so
I think this can step the integration forward.
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists